New solution
en/12.2.6.md
+85 −0
| @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ | |||
| + | ### Statement | ||
| + | |||
| + | $12.2.6.$ [Insert the problem statement] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ### Solution | ||
| + | |||
| + | Data and geometry | ||
| + | |||
| + | · Wavelength: \lambda = 1.541 \times 10^{-10}\,\text{m}. | ||
| + | · Diffraction grating: N = 200 lines/mm. | ||
| + | d = \frac{1}{N} = \frac{1}{200\,\text{mm}^{-1}} = 5 \times 10^{-6}\,\text{m}. | ||
| + | · Grazing incidence angle (relative to the surface): \alpha = 20'. | ||
| + | \alpha = \frac{20}{60}^\circ = \frac{1}{3}^\circ \approx 0.3333^\circ. | ||
| + | · The grating works in reflection, and the gold layer ensures high reflectivity without modifying the diffraction condition. | ||
| + | |||
| + | When working with grazing angles (measured from the surface), the diffraction condition for a reflection grating is: | ||
| + | |||
| + | d(\cos\alpha - \cos\beta_m) = m\lambda, \qquad m = 0, 1, 2, \dots | ||
| + | |||
| + | · \alpha: incident angle relative to the surface. | ||
| + | · \beta_m: diffracted beam angle of order m relative to the surface. | ||
| + | · d: grating period. | ||
| + | · m: diffraction order. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For m = 0: | ||
| + | |||
| + | d(\cos\alpha - \cos\beta_0) = 0 \;\Longrightarrow\; \cos\beta_0 = \cos\alpha. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Since angles are between 0 and \pi/2, we obtain: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \beta_0 = \alpha = 20'. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is specular reflection. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For m = 1: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \cos\beta_1 = \cos\alpha - \frac{\lambda}{d}. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Compute each term: | ||
| + | |||
| + | · \cos\alpha = \cos(20') = \cos(0.33333^\circ). | ||
| + | Using a calculator or series: \cos(0.33333^\circ) \approx 0.9999831. | ||
| + | · \lambda / d = \dfrac{1.541 \times 10^{-10}}{5 \times 10^{-6}} = 3.082 \times 10^{-5} = 0.00003082. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Then: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \cos\beta_1 = 0.9999831 - 0.00003082 = 0.99995228. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thus: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \beta_1 = \arccos(0.99995228). | ||
| + | |||
| + | For small angles we can use \cos\theta \approx 1 - \theta^2/2: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1 - \frac{\beta_1^2}{2} \approx 0.99995228 \;\Longrightarrow\; \frac{\beta_1^2}{2} \approx 0.00004772 \;\Longrightarrow\; \beta_1 \approx \sqrt{0.00009544} \approx 0.00977\,\text{rad}. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In degrees: 0.00977\,\text{rad} \times \dfrac{180^\circ}{\pi} \approx 0.5597^\circ. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Exact calculation with arccos: \beta_1 \approx 0.5594^\circ. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The desired difference is: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \Delta\beta = \beta_1 - \beta_0 = \beta_1 - \alpha. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Substituting: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \Delta\beta \approx 0.5594^\circ - 0.3333^\circ = 0.2261^\circ. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In minutes of arc: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 0.2261^\circ \times 60'/\text{degree} \approx 13.57'. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Final result | ||
| + | |||
| + | \boxed{\Delta\beta \approx 0.226^\circ \;\;(\text{about } 13.6\text{ minutes of arc})}. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Interpretation: | ||
| + | The zero-order beam is specularly reflected (grazing angle of 20′), while the first-order beam emerges at a slightly larger angle (≈ 33.6′). The difference is small because the wavelength is much smaller than the grating period. The gold layer does not affect the diffraction condition; it merely ensures reflection of the X‑rays. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | #### Answer | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Insert a concise answer or boxed result] | ||
| @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ | |||
| ### Statement | |||
| $12.2.6.$ [Insert the problem statement] | |||
| ### Solution | |||
| Data and geometry | |||
| · Wavelength: \lambda = 1.541 \times 10^{-10}\,\text{m}. | |||
| · Diffraction grating: N = 200 lines/mm. | |||
| d = \frac{1}{N} = \frac{1}{200\,\text{mm}^{-1}} = 5 \times 10^{-6}\,\text{m}. | |||
| · Grazing incidence angle (relative to the surface): \alpha = 20'. | |||
| \alpha = \frac{20}{60}^\circ = \frac{1}{3}^\circ \approx 0.3333^\circ. | |||
| · The grating works in reflection, and the gold layer ensures high reflectivity without modifying the diffraction condition. | |||
| When working with grazing angles (measured from the surface), the diffraction condition for a reflection grating is: | |||
| d(\cos\alpha - \cos\beta_m) = m\lambda, \qquad m = 0, 1, 2, \dots | |||
| · \alpha: incident angle relative to the surface. | |||
| · \beta_m: diffracted beam angle of order m relative to the surface. | |||
| · d: grating period. | |||
| · m: diffraction order. | |||
| For m = 0: | |||
| d(\cos\alpha - \cos\beta_0) = 0 \;\Longrightarrow\; \cos\beta_0 = \cos\alpha. | |||
| Since angles are between 0 and \pi/2, we obtain: | |||
| \beta_0 = \alpha = 20'. | |||
| This is specular reflection. | |||
| For m = 1: | |||
| \cos\beta_1 = \cos\alpha - \frac{\lambda}{d}. | |||
| Compute each term: | |||
| · \cos\alpha = \cos(20') = \cos(0.33333^\circ). | |||
| Using a calculator or series: \cos(0.33333^\circ) \approx 0.9999831. | |||
| · \lambda / d = \dfrac{1.541 \times 10^{-10}}{5 \times 10^{-6}} = 3.082 \times 10^{-5} = 0.00003082. | |||
| Then: | |||
| \cos\beta_1 = 0.9999831 - 0.00003082 = 0.99995228. | |||
| Thus: | |||
| \beta_1 = \arccos(0.99995228). | |||
| For small angles we can use \cos\theta \approx 1 - \theta^2/2: | |||
| 1 - \frac{\beta_1^2}{2} \approx 0.99995228 \;\Longrightarrow\; \frac{\beta_1^2}{2} \approx 0.00004772 \;\Longrightarrow\; \beta_1 \approx \sqrt{0.00009544} \approx 0.00977\,\text{rad}. | |||
| In degrees: 0.00977\,\text{rad} \times \dfrac{180^\circ}{\pi} \approx 0.5597^\circ. | |||
| Exact calculation with arccos: \beta_1 \approx 0.5594^\circ. | |||
| The desired difference is: | |||
| \Delta\beta = \beta_1 - \beta_0 = \beta_1 - \alpha. | |||
| Substituting: | |||
| \Delta\beta \approx 0.5594^\circ - 0.3333^\circ = 0.2261^\circ. | |||
| In minutes of arc: | |||
| 0.2261^\circ \times 60'/\text{degree} \approx 13.57'. | |||
| --- | |||
| Final result | |||
| \boxed{\Delta\beta \approx 0.226^\circ \;\;(\text{about } 13.6\text{ minutes of arc})}. | |||
| Interpretation: | |||
| The zero-order beam is specularly reflected (grazing angle of 20′), while the first-order beam emerges at a slightly larger angle (≈ 33.6′). The difference is small because the wavelength is much smaller than the grating period. The gold layer does not affect the diffraction condition; it merely ensures reflection of the X‑rays. | |||
| #### Answer | |||
| [Insert a concise answer or boxed result] | |||