The solution at revision #18896 of , by Alexphysics. This is not the current version.

Statement

12.2.6.

A very narrow beam of Kα-radiation from copper (λ = 1.541 · 10−10m) falls
on a glass diffraction grating having 200 lines per 1 mm and covered with a
thin layer of gold at an angle of 20′to its surface. Determine the difference in
reflection angles between the first-and zero-order beams.

Solution

first remark data and geometry

· Wavelength:

· Diffraction grating:.
.

· Grazing incidence angle (relative to the surface):

· The grating works in reflection, and the gold layer ensures high reflectivity without modifying the diffraction condition.

When working with grazing angles (measured from the surface), the diffraction condition for a reflection grating is:

· : incident angle relative to the surface.

· : diffracted beam angle of order m relative to the surface.

· d: grating period.

· m: diffraction order.

now For m = 0:

.

Since angles are between 0 and , we obtain:

.

This is specular reflection.

now For m = 1:

.

Compute each term:

· .

Using a calculator or series: .

· .

Then:

.

Thus:

.

For small angles we can use :

.

In degrees:

.

Exact calculation with arccos: .

The desired difference is:

.

Substituting:

.

In minutes of arc:

.

Answer

The Final result

.

Interpretation:
The zero-order beam is specularly reflected (grazing angle of 20′), while the first-order beam emerges at a slightly larger angle (≈ 33.6′).
The difference is small because the wavelength is much smaller than the grating period. The gold layer does not affect the diffraction condition; it merely ensures reflection of the X‑rays.