Edits to “Statement”, “Solution”

Alexphysics edited
revision #18960 parent #18959 ← older newer →
@@ -1,17 +1,32 @@
### Statement
−$12.1.15.$ [Insert the problem statement]
+$12.1.15 $
−### Solution
+Using the formula Eizl= ()E given in the problem 12.1.14. solve the fol-
+t−
+c
+c
+lowing problems:
+a. Determine the electric field strength in a plane wave emitted by a plane
+capacitor as it moves with a constant acceleration a directed parallel to its
+plates. The distance between the plates d, the electric field strength inside
+the capacitor E.
+b. The linear current density on the plate varies sinusoidally with the ampli-
+tude i0. Determine in SI and CGS the amplitude of the electric field strength
+in the wave emitted by this plate.
+c. Determine the reflection coefficient of an electromagnetic wave incident on
+a thin conducting film perpendicular to its surface. Film thickness x, number
+of conduction electrons per unit volume ne, wave frequency v.
+
+### Solution
−For a charged plate moving with velocity v, the radiation electric field at a distance x is
+the radiation electric field at a distance x is
$E_{\text{rad}} = -\frac{v}{2c}\,E\!\left(t - \frac{x}{c}\right)$
where E is the field inside the capacitor and c is the speed of light.
−So we start by parts
−---
+we start by parts
a) Parallel‑plate capacitor with constant acceleration a
@@ -24,18 +39,24 @@Solution
Solution:
−1. Contribution from the upper plate (distance x):
+Contribution from the upper plate (distance x):
− E_1 = -\frac{v}{2c}\,E\!\left(t - \frac{x}{c}\right).
−2. Contribution from the lower plate (distance x + d, opposite charge)
+$E_1 = -\frac{v}{2c}\,E\!\left(t - \frac{x}{c}\right)$
+
+Contribution from the lower plate (distance x + d, opposite charge)
+
$ E_2 = \frac{v}{2c}\,E\!\left(t - \frac{x+d}{c}\right)$
The sign change is because the lower plate has charge -Q, which reverses the direction of the emitted field
− $ v(t) = a t. The retarded times are t - x/c and t - (x+d)/c$
+ $ v(t) = a t$
+
+The retarded times are
−$ E_1 = -\frac{a}{2c}\,E\left(t - \frac{x}{c}\right), \qquad$
+$t - x/c and t - (x+d)/c$
+$ E_1 = -\frac{a}{2c}\,E\left(t - \frac{x}{c}\right), \qquad$
+
$ E_2 = \frac{a}{2c}\,E\left(t - \frac{x+d}{c}\right)$
$ E_{\text{rad}} = E_1 + E_2 = -\frac{aE}{2c}\left[\left(t - \frac{x}{c}\right) - \left(t - \frac{x+d}{c}\right)\right]$
@@ -56,23 +77,31 @@Solution
Solution:
−1. Relation between surface current and emitted field:
+ Relation between surface current and emitted field:
− A plate with surface current$ K (A/m) $
+A plate with surface current
+$ K (A/m) $
+
emits a plane wave whose electric field in the perpendicular direction is:
+
$ E_{\text{rad}} = \frac{\mu_0 c}{2}\,K$
− The amplitude of the surface current is $i_0.$
−2. Expression in SI:
+The amplitude of the surface current is $i_0.$
+
+ Expression in SI:
+
$ E_{\text{rad}} = \frac{\mu_0 c}{2}\,i_0
$ Using $\mu_0 c = \frac{1}${c\varepsilon_0}$
it can also be written as:
− $ \boxed{E_{\text{rad}} = \frac{i_0}{2c\varepsilon_0}} \quad (\text{SI})$
−3. Expression in CGS:
− In the Gaussian system, the same relation is:
− $ \boxed{E_{\text{rad}} = \frac{2\pi i_0}{c}} \quad (\text{CGS})$
+$\boxed{E_{\text{rad}} = \frac{i_0}{2c\varepsilon_0}} \quad (\text{SI})$
+
+Expression in CGS:
+
+In the Gaussian system, the same relation is:
+
+$\boxed{E_{\text{rad}} = \frac{2\pi i_0}{c}} \quad (\text{CGS})$
---
unchanged lines 44