Edits to “Statement”, “Answer”

Alexphysics edited
revision #19164 parent #19163 ← older newer →
@@ -1,7 +1,15 @@
### Statement
−$8.2.23.$ [Insert the problem statement]
+$8.2.23.$
+Why is the kinetic energy of current carriers associated with their ordered
+motion not taken into account when considering the electric current in a sub-
+stance?
+
+Estimate the kinetic energy of one electron (in electron volts) at a
+current of I = 100 A in a sodium wire with a cross-section of S = 1 mm2The
+number of conduction electrons per unit volume of the wire ne= 2.5·1022cm−3.
+
### Solution
Let's start with the first part: Why is the kinetic energy of ordered motion not considered in electric current?
@@ -57,4 +65,4 @@Solution
#### Answer
−[Insert a concise answer or boxed result]
+$\boxed{K \approx 2 \times 10^{-15}\ \text{eV}}$