Edits to “Statement”, “Solution”, “Answer”

Valter edited
revision #20505 parent #18787 ← older
@@ -1,59 +1,27 @@
### Statement
−$6.3.17.$ Inside the cavity of a long uncharged conductor, the radius of which is r, there
−is a charge q. The conductor is surrounded by a cylindrical screen of radius
−R. Conductor length L ≫ R. How does the electric field strength outside the
−cavity in the middle part of the system depend on the distance to the axis of
−this system?
+$6.3.17^\ast$. Inside the cavity of a long uncharged conductor, the radius of which is $r$, there is a charge $q$. The conductor is surrounded by a cylindrical screen of radius $R$. Conductor length $L \gg R$. How does the electric field strength outside the cavity in the middle part of the system depend on the distance to the axis of this system?
+![For problem $6.3.17$|592x211, 100%](../../img/6.3.17/Снимок экрана 2026-09-01 223947.png)
+
### Solution
−Given that L ≫ R , we neglect edge effects in the middle region. The system behaves as infinitely long. Thus
+Let's consider the middle part of the system. Since the length of the conductors is significantly greater than their radii ($L \gg R$), we can neglect the edge effects at the ends of the cylinders. In the middle region, the system possesses axial (cylindrical) symmetry.
−$E= E(x)\hat{x}$
+<b>1. Inside the metal:</b>
+The electric field strength inside the uncharged conductor itself (within the bulk of the wall) is zero. The charge $q$ induces a charge of $-q$ on the walls of the cavity. According to the law of conservation of charge, a charge of $+q$ appears on the outer surface of the conductor (at radius $r$).
−The "cylindrical shield" of radius R acts as an outer conductor that shields the field.
+<b>2. Field in the gap ($r < \rho < R$):</b>
+The charge $+q$ is distributed uniformly over the outer surface of the conductor of radius $r$ along the length $L$. The linear charge density is $\lambda = \frac{q}{L}$.
+We apply Gauss's Law to a coaxial cylindrical surface of radius $\rho$ (where $r < \rho < R$) and length $l$:
+$$E \cdot 2\pi\rho l = \frac{\lambda l}{\varepsilon_0} = \frac{(q/L) l}{\varepsilon_0}$$
+From this, the electric field strength in the gap between the conductor and the screen is:
+$$E(\rho) = \frac{q}{2\pi\varepsilon_0 L \rho}$$
−The charge +q in the cavity induces a charge –q on the inner surface (ρ = r).
+<b>3. Field outside the screen ($\rho > R$):</b>
+Looking closely at the diagram provided in the problem, the outer cylindrical screen of radius $R$ has a grounding symbol. A grounded screen has zero potential and completely shields the electric field by inducing a charge of $-q$ on its inner surface. Therefore, there is completely no field outside the system:
+$$E(\rho) = 0$$
−Since the conductor is neutral, a charge +q appears on its outer surface.
−
−"We choose a cylindrical Gaussian surface of radius \rho and length L, coaxial with the system.
−
−${E} \cdot d\vec{A} = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0}$
−
−$E \cdot 2\pi \rho L = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0}$
−
−$E(\rho) = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{2\pi \varepsilon_0 L \rho}$
−
−$For \ r < \rho < R :$
−
−$Q_{\text{enc}} = q$
−
−$E(\rho) = \frac{q}{2\pi \varepsilon_0 L \rho}$
−
−$For\ \rho > R :$
−
−$Q_{\text{enc}} = 0 \quad \rightarrow \quad E = 0.$
−
−If the shield were isolated and uncharged, the enclosed charge would be q and the field would remain as
−
−$E = \frac{q}{2\pi \varepsilon_0 L \rho} .$
−
−$ E = 0 \ for \ \rho > R .$
−
#### Answer
−
−The final answer is .
−
−$\boxed{E(\rho) = \frac{q}{2\pi \varepsilon_0 L}\,\frac{1}{\rho} \quad \text{for} \quad r < \rho < R}$
−
−$\boxed{E(\rho) = 0 \quad \text{for} \quad \rho > R \ \text{(shield grounded)}}$
−
−The direction is radial: outward if
−$q > 0,$
−inward if
−$ q < 0.$
−
−and Inside the conductor metal $(\rho = r) $
−the field is zero.
+$E(\rho) = \frac{q}{2\pi\varepsilon_0 L \rho}$ for $r < \rho < R$;
+$E(\rho) = 0$ for $\rho > R$ (since the screen is grounded).