The solution at revision #20568 of , by Valter. This is not the current version.

Statement

12.1.14∗. A charged plate, the electric field strength of which is , moving parallel to itself with a velocity , creates a magnetic field of induction . Therefore, when the velocity of the plate decreases by an amount , an "extra" magnetic "microfield" of induction arises in the surrounding space. Summing up, these "microfields" give an electromagnetic wave, the electric field strength of which depends only on the velocity of the plate:

The index means that when calculating the field strength at a distance from the plate, the value of its velocity must be taken at the time .
Prove the validity of the formula for the case when the velocity changes as shown in the figures (b and c).

For problem $12.1.14$
For problem

Solution

Let's prove the formula using the basic laws of electrodynamics.

  1. The static electric field of an infinite charged plate is directed along the normal to it (along the x-axis) and is equal to .

  2. When the plate begins to move parallel to itself with a velocity , it creates a surface current .

  3. According to Ampere's law, this surface current generates a magnetic field near the plate (as ) equal to:

    By multiplying the numerator and denominator by and considering that , and , we obtain the boundary condition for the magnetic field at the plate surface:

  4. Any change in this magnetic field (caused by a change in velocity) detaches from the plate and propagates through space as a plane electromagnetic wave at the speed of light . Consequently, the field at a distance at time exactly repeats the field at the plate, but delayed by a time :

  5. In a traveling plane electromagnetic wave, the transverse electric field strength (which is directed parallel to the plate) and the magnetic induction are strictly related by .

  6. Substituting the derived expression for into this relation, we arrive at the required formula:

Application to graphs (b) and (c):
The derived formula is universal because the wave equation is linear, and the boundary condition directly tracks any function .

  • For graph (b): the velocity drops abruptly from to at time . In space, this will look like a wavefront behind which (closer to the plate) the transverse field is zero, and ahead of which it is . This termination front moves away from the plate at speed .
  • For graph (c): the velocity increases abruptly from to at time . This generates a wavefront behind which a uniform transverse field is established, propagating behind the front at speed .
    In both cases, the formula provides the exact instantaneous value of the radiated field at any point in space.