Новое решение
en/6.3.17.md
+42 −0
| @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ | |||
| + | ### Statement | ||
| + | |||
| + | $6.3.17.$ [Insert the problem statement] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ### Solution | ||
| + | |||
| + | Given that L \gg R , we neglect edge effects in the middle region. The system behaves as infinitely long. Thus | ||
| + | |||
| + | $E= E(x)\hat{x} | ||
| + | |||
| + | The "cylindrical shield" of radius R acts as an outer conductor that shields the field. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The charge +q in the cavity induces a charge –q on the inner surface (ρ = r). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Since the conductor is neutral, a charge +q appears on its outer surface. | ||
| + | |||
| + | "We choose a cylindrical Gaussian surface of radius \rho and length L, coaxial with the system. | ||
| + | |||
| + | \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A} = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0} | ||
| + | |||
| + | E \cdot 2\pi \rho L = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0} | ||
| + | |||
| + | E(\rho) = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{2\pi \varepsilon_0 L \rho} | ||
| + | \]" | ||
| + | |||
| + | For r < \rho < R : | ||
| + | |||
| + | Q_{\text{enc}} = q. | ||
| + | |||
| + | E(\rho) = \frac{q}{2\pi \varepsilon_0 L \rho} | ||
| + | |||
| + | For \rho > R : | ||
| + | |||
| + | Q_{\text{enc}} = 0 \quad \rightarrow \quad E = 0. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If the shield were isolated and uncharged, the enclosed charge would be q and the field would remain as E = \frac{q}{2\pi \varepsilon_0 L \rho} . | ||
| + | |||
| + | E = 0 for \rho > R . | ||
| + | |||
| + | #### Answer | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Insert a concise answer or boxed result] | ||
| @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ | |||
| ### Statement | |||
| $6.3.17.$ [Insert the problem statement] | |||
| ### Solution | |||
| Given that L \gg R , we neglect edge effects in the middle region. The system behaves as infinitely long. Thus | |||
| $E= E(x)\hat{x} | |||
| The "cylindrical shield" of radius R acts as an outer conductor that shields the field. | |||
| The charge +q in the cavity induces a charge –q on the inner surface (ρ = r). | |||
| Since the conductor is neutral, a charge +q appears on its outer surface. | |||
| "We choose a cylindrical Gaussian surface of radius \rho and length L, coaxial with the system. | |||
| \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A} = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0} | |||
| E \cdot 2\pi \rho L = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0} | |||
| E(\rho) = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{2\pi \varepsilon_0 L \rho} | |||
| \]" | |||
| For r < \rho < R : | |||
| Q_{\text{enc}} = q. | |||
| E(\rho) = \frac{q}{2\pi \varepsilon_0 L \rho} | |||
| For \rho > R : | |||
| Q_{\text{enc}} = 0 \quad \rightarrow \quad E = 0. | |||
| If the shield were isolated and uncharged, the enclosed charge would be q and the field would remain as E = \frac{q}{2\pi \varepsilon_0 L \rho} . | |||
| E = 0 for \rho > R . | |||
| #### Answer | |||
| [Insert a concise answer or boxed result] | |||