Решение на момент правки #18898 от , автор Alexphysics. Это не текущая версия.

Statement

12.2.8.

If a circular hole (for example, an iris diaphragm) is enlarged in such a way
that its radius, which was equal to the radius of one Fresnel zone, reaches
the radius of two zones, then at point A the radiation intensity will signifi-
cantly decrease, falling to zero, although the radiation flux through the hole
increases almost twice. How do these two facts fit together?

For problem $12.2.8$

Solution

Definition of Fresnel zones

Consider a spherical wavefront passing through a circular hole of variable radius. The observation point A is on the axis, at a distance b from the diaphragm. The wavefront is divided into Fresnel zones: the m-th zone is a ring bounded by radii and such that the distance from the edge of the m-th zone to point A is

The radius of the m-th zone (for m not too large) is:

,

where a is the distance from the source to the diaphragm.

The area of each zone is approximately constant:

.

Amplitude of the resultant wave at A

Each zone contributes an amplitude A_m at point A. Due to the path difference of
between consecutive zones, the contributions alternate in phase:

· Zone 1: amplitude , reference phase.
· Zone 2: amplitude , phase shifted by (opposite).
· Zone 3: amplitude, in phase with zone 1

The total amplitude (considering an aperture with N complete zones) is the alternating sum:

.

The A_m decrease slowly as m increases due to inclination (obliquity factor), but for the first few zones they are practically equal:

Case of 1 Fresnel zone (radius)

Only the first zone is uncovered:

.

Intensity at A:

.

This is the maximum possible intensity for that source and distance (about 4 times the intensity without the screen).

Case of 2 zones (radius)

Now the first two complete zones are uncovered:

A^{(2)} = A_1 - A_2.

Since, it follows that:

.

Destructive interference between the two zones produces darkness at the center (point A).

The power passing through the hole is proportional to the total open area. The area of one zone is
. For 1 zone, area ;
for 2 zones, area

Thus the flux roughly doubles when going from 1 to 2 zones:

.

Energy is not obliged to concentrate at the central point A.

· With 1 zone, almost all the energy that passes through is focused at A (single diffraction maximum).
· With 2 zones, interference cancels the intensity on the axis, but the energy is redistributed into lateral directions (a bright ring appears around the dark center, corresponding to the secondary maxima of Fresnel diffraction).

Conservation of energy: The integral of the intensity over a closed surface must equal the total power passing through the hole. The energy that is "missing" at A is found in the side lobes.

Answer

The total amplitude on the axis is the alternating sum of the zone contributions. For , one obtains

and

therefore

.
At the same time, the uncovered area is double, so the total flux is also double. The energy does not disappear; rather, it is diffracted away from the central axis. Both facts are perfectly compatible and are described by the same Fresnel formalism.