Edits to “Solution”, “Answer”

Julius de Rojas edited
revision #15572 parent #15571 ← older newer →
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
−### Statement
−
$1.2.17.$
![For problem $1.2.17$|552x466, 50%](../../img/1.2.17/1_2_17.png)
@@ -42,7 +40,7 @@Solution
\end{align*}
Both of these result are showing in the Figure below. We note that, although the coordinates plotted below the t-axis are half as big, because their times scales are also half as big, the velocities in the ranges $-1.0~\mu\mathrm{s} \leq t \leq 1.0\,\mu\mathrm{s}$ and $7.0~\mu\text{s} \leq t \leq 8.0\,\mu\text{s}$ are exactly the same. However, since the changes in velocity are inverted and the time scale is half as big, we have that the accerlation in $6.0~\mu\text{s} \leq t \leq 7.0\,\mu\text{s}$ has the opposite sign and is twice as big as the acceleration in the region $1.0~\mu\text{s} \leq t \leq 3.0\,\mu\text{s}$.
−![Solution $1.2.17$: Plot of velocity and acceleration vs. time.|716x864, 50%](../../img/1.2.17/Problem 1_2_17_Plot1.png)
+![Figure $1$: Plot of velocity and acceleation vs. time.|716x864, 50%](../../img/1.2.17/Problem 1_2_17_Plot1.png)
#### Answer
The velocities in the ranges $-1.0~\mu\mathrm{s} \leq t \leq 1.0\,\mu\mathrm{s}$ and $7.0~\mu\text{s} \leq t \leq 8.0\,\mu\text{s}$ are exactly the same. However, since the changes in velocity are inverted and the time scale is half as big, we have that the accerlation in $6.0~\mu\text{s} \leq t \leq 7.0\,\mu\text{s}$ has the opposite sign and is twice as big as the acceleration in the region $1.0~\mu\text{s} \leq t \leq 3.0\,\mu\text{s}$.
@@ -70,4 +68,4 @@Answer
}
}
$$
−![Solution $1.2.17$: Plot of velocity and acceleation vs. time.|716x864, 50%](../../img/1.2.17/Problem 1_2_17_Plot1.png)
+![Figure $2$: Plot of velocity and acceleation vs. time.|716x864, 50%](../../img/1.2.17/Problem 1_2_17_Plot1.png)