New solution

Tete edited
revision #20665 newer →
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+### Statement
+
+$13.1.5.$ [Insert the problem statement]
+
+### Solution
+
+![For problem $13.1.5$ |750x590, 31%](../../img/13.1.5/Savchenko.png)
+
+Mirror image is front-back inverted, but we often say that it is left-right inverted because we fix the up-down direction and use it together with the front-back direction to define the left-right direction. More precisely, if we consider $\hat\imath$ as up and $\hat\jmath$ as front, then left is defined as $\hat\imath\times\hat\jmath=\hat k$. When mirror image is front-back inverted, left becomes $\hat\imath\times(-\hat\jmath)=-\hat k$, and we say that the image is left-right inverted.
+
+Imagine what happens when we fix the left-right direction and use it together with the front-back direction to define the up-down direction. If we consider $\hat\k$ as left and $\hat\jmath$ as front, then up is defined as $\hat\jmath\times\hat k=\hat\imath$. When mirror image is front-back inverted, up becomes $-\hat\jmath\times\hat k)=-\hat\imath$, and we might as well say that the image is up-down inverted.
+
+#### Answer
+
+[Insert a concise answer or boxed result]